is a group of climate scientist reviewing press articles on climate change, but there is only so much a few scientists can do & by the time the reviews are in & summarized the article is mostly old news.

With a larger group we could review more articles & have results while people are still reading it.

We could test how well such a larger group does (& how to statistically combine their grades) by comparing their assessments with the ones later published by Climate Feedback.

If we would make such a feasibility study would you be willing to participate?

You would get a mail when Climate Feedback starts a review & when it is finished, have that time to grade the article, maybe add how confident you are or a classification on the topic.

Interesting. On Twitter 8 people are interested in reviewing. On Mastodon 1 person is interested in designing the system.

Fits to both communities. Twitter big with many scientists. Mastodon still small and technology focussed.

Melde dich an, um an der Konversation teilzuhaben ist eine Mastodon-Instanz für Bonn und alle, die Bonn mögen.

Impressum, Datenschutzerklärung